Choosing a model

Interim, fractional, permanent — or something else entirely.

Four ways to buy senior finance capability, and they solve genuinely different problems. Most businesses that get this wrong do not overpay — they buy the right seniority for the wrong shape of problem, and it costs them a year.

Why the words matter

"Fractional" and "interim" are used interchangeably and mean opposite things.

An interim CFO is full-time for a fixed period. A fractional CFO is part-time for an open-ended one. The first fills a hole; the second adds a capability you were never going to hire for.

Get them the wrong way round and you either put a full-time salary against a two-days-a-month problem, or you put two days a month against a business in the middle of a refinance. Both are expensive, and the second one is dangerous.

There is now a fourth option that did not meaningfully exist five years ago, and for a large share of businesses it is the right one. It is at the bottom of this page, and we have tried to be honest about when it is not.

The four models

What each one is actually for.

Model 01

Interim

Full-time, fixed term. Someone senior in the seat five days a week for a defined period — typically while you recruit, through a transaction, or because the incumbent left abruptly. They carry the whole role, including the parts nobody enjoys: the team, the audit, the bank relationship, the board papers.

An interim is a premium for intensity — you are paying for speed, focus and a defined outcome over a fixed period. Cost is at or above a permanent salary on a pro-rata basis, often with a premium for the lack of security and the speed of start. That premium is usually worth paying, because the alternative is a finance function running without a head during the period you can least afford it.

Right when: the seat is empty and the work cannot wait. A CFO has resigned, a transaction is live, an audit has gone wrong, or the business is in a covenant conversation with its bank.

Full-time · 3 to 12 months · Fills a hole
Model 02

Fractional

Part-time, ongoing — and a contractor, not an employee. That distinction matters: a fractional CFO works across several businesses, which is what makes the economics work for both sides, and it is why this is not the same thing as a part-time permanent hire. A day a week, two days a month, or a standing rhythm that flexes with what is happening. The relationship is open-ended and the value compounds — by month six they know your business, your board and your bank, and the advice gets materially better because of it.

This is the model for a business that needs CFO-grade judgement but does not have CFO-grade volume. You are buying the judgement, not the hours, and the honest test is whether the decisions you make in that day a month are worth more than the fee. For most businesses past a certain complexity, they are.

Right when: the numbers are getting away from you, the board is asking questions you cannot answer quickly, or you are making decisions that need someone who has made them before. No crisis required.

Part-time · Open-ended · Adds a capability
Model 03

Permanent

Full-time, employed. They own the function outright and become the face of finance to banks, auditors, investors and regulators — relationships built over years that matter externally. They make the multi-year calls on the shape and succession of the team. The right answer eventually, and the wrong answer too early. A full-time CFO costs salary, on-costs, equity in many cases, and a recruitment process that takes months and sometimes fails. In return you get someone whose entire attention is your business.

The mistake is hiring one before there is enough work to hold them. An under-occupied CFO does not become a better CFO — they build reporting nobody asked for, or they leave. The second mistake is the reverse: keeping a fractional arrangement well past the point where the business needed someone in the building every day.

Right when: the finance function is large enough to need daily leadership, the board wants a named executive, or a transaction has created a permanent step-change in complexity.

Full-time · Permanent · Owns the function
Model 04

Platform with supervision

The function delivered as a service, with a named Chartered Accountant signing. The mechanical work — coding, reconciliation, the close, the pack, the forecast, the compliance calendar — runs on supervised agents. The judgement, the escalations and the signature stay with a person. You pay a monthly fee rather than a salary or a day rate.

What this replaces is not the CFO. It replaces the two to four people underneath one, and it makes the CFO layer affordable at a size where it previously was not. The honest limitation: it will not sit in your management meeting and argue with your sales director. If that is what you need, you need a person, and we will tell you so.

Right when: the reporting is late or unreliable, you need a forward view you do not currently have, or you are paying for finance headcount doing work that no longer needs a human.

Monthly subscription · Ongoing · Replaces the function, not the judgement

Side by side

The same question, four answers.

Interim Fractional Permanent Platform
CommitmentFull-timePart-timeFull-timeContinuous, unattended between reviews
DurationFixed, 3–12 monthsOpen-endedPermanentRolling, monthly
Starts inDays to weeksDaysTwo to six monthsWeeks
Cost shapeDay rate at a premiumRetainer or day rateSalary, on-costs, often equityMonthly fee
SolvesAn empty seatMissing judgementA function needing daily leadershipWork that no longer needs a person
Does the volume workYes, and it is a waste of themNo — that is the gap it exposesDelegates it to a team you also pay forYes, that is the point
WeaknessLeaves, taking the contextNot there when it breaks on a TuesdayExpensive, slow to hire, hard to unwindWill not argue with your sales director
They combine, and usually should. The most common sensible arrangement we see is a platform doing the mechanical work with a fractional CFO on top of it — the reporting and forecasting run continuously, and a senior person spends their day a month on the decisions rather than on assembling the pack. That combination typically costs less than one mid-level finance hire and produces considerably more.

The triggers

What is actually happening in your business right now?

Find the row that sounds like this month. The model follows from the problem, not from the size of the business.

What is happeningWhat you probably needWhy
Your CFO or finance manager has resignedInterimThe seat cannot be empty through a close, a payroll run and a board meeting. Recruit properly behind the interim rather than in a panic.
You are mid-transaction — selling, raising, refinancingInterim or specialist projectTransaction work is full-time for the period it runs, and it is not a side-of-desk job for whoever is already stretched.
The board is asking questions you answer a week laterPlatform, then fractionalThe lag is a reporting problem before it is a judgement problem. Fix the pipes first, then add the judgement.
The management accounts arrive on the 20th and you do not trust themPlatformThis is a process and data problem. Adding a senior person to a broken close makes an expensive person do bookkeeping.
You have no forward view — no forecast, no runway numberPlatform plus fractionalThe model needs building once by someone senior, then maintaining continuously. Two different jobs.
You are about to expand into a second countryFractional or projectStructure, tax and entity decisions are made once and are expensive to reverse. This is judgement work, front-loaded.
Your bank has asked for something you cannot produceInterim or fractional, urgentlyCovenant conversations reward speed and precision. Being slow here changes the terms you get.
Finance is four people and nobody is leading themPermanentA team that size needs daily leadership. Fractional arrangements do not manage people well.
You are paying for finance headcount doing work software now doesPlatform, and a hard conversationThe cost saving is real, and so is the obligation to handle the people side properly. That is an employment matter for you and your adviser, not a software decision.

The question nobody asks

Who owns the close when they leave?

Interim and fractional both quietly assume there is a team underneath to hand back to. Very often there is not — and that, rather than scope creep, is why so many engagements keep getting extended.

The pattern is consistent. A senior person arrives, rebuilds the reporting, fixes the forecast, gets the bank conversation under control. Then the engagement ends, and the capability leaves with them, because it lived in their head and their spreadsheets. Six months later the business is back where it started and reaching for another CFO.

So the better question is not which model to buy. It is what does the business still own after the engagement ends. An interim who leaves behind a working close, a documented method and a maintained forecast has created more durable value than a permanent hire who quietly becomes the system.

This is the gap the platform fills. It is the bench. The close, the reporting rhythm, the forecast and the compliance calendar keep running whether or not a senior person is in the building this month — which is what makes a fractional arrangement work properly, and what stops an interim engagement becoming permanent by accident.

Where we sit

We do three of the four, and we will tell you when it is the fourth.

XLCFO delivers the platform, provides fractional CFOs, and takes interim and project mandates for transactions. We do not place permanent hires, and when a permanent CFO is what you need we will say so and help you write the brief.

We will also tell you when you need none of it. A business with straightforward books, one entity, no debt and no transaction on the horizon has an accountant and does not need us. Selling a subscription to a company that does not need one is a short-term win and a long-term reference problem.

The most common answer. For businesses between roughly two and fifty million in revenue, with debt or growth plans or more than one entity, the platform plus a fractional CFO on top of it is the arrangement that produces the most per dollar. It is not the most expensive option we sell, which is why we are comfortable saying it plainly.

Not sure which one you are?

Thirty minutes, no pitch. Describe what is happening and we will tell you which model fits — including when the answer is that you do not need us yet.